Department of Transportation

Browse over 830 requests from this government agency

Go Back

LRT Line 2 East Extension Project

Requested from DOTr by Marc Casinsinan at 10:08 AM on Sep 11, 2019.
Purpose: Thesis Purposes
Date of Coverage: 09/10/2019 - 09/10/2019
Tracking no: #DOTr-405020417738

Marc 10:08 AM, Sep 11, 2019

Good day! I am Marc Conrad M. Casinsinan, a 5th year BS Architecture student from Polytechnic University of the Philippines. I would like to request the following data

1.) Feasibility Study on LRT Line 2 East Extension Project
2.) Feasibility Study on LRT Cogeo Extension
3.) LRT Line 2 Ridership Statistics

Kriscia 04:55 PM, Sep 12, 2019

September 12, 2019

Dear Marc,

Thank you for your request dated Sep 11, 2019 under Executive Order No. 2 (s. 2016) on Freedom of Information in the Executive Branch, for LRT Line 2 East Extension Project.

We received your request on Sep 11, 2019 and will respond on or before Oct 02, 2019 10:08:16 AM, in accordance with the Executive Order's implementing rules and regulations. 

Should you have any questions regarding your request, kindly contact me using the reply function on the eFOI portal at https://www.foi.gov.ph/requests/aglzfmVmb2ktcGhyHgsSB0NvbnRlbnQiEURPVHItNDA1MDIwNDE3NzM4DA, for request with ticket number #DOTr-405020417738.

Thank you.

Respectfully,

Kriscia Mallari
FOI Officer
Apologies for the late response as we needed to consult our legal department regarding your request. Please take note that the project you are requesting has not yet been procured/awarded.

Below is the reply of our legal department.

"After review, this Office is of the view that the request of Mr. Enriquez cannot be given due course considering that the disclosure of the said “Feasibility Studies” are subject to certain limitations and restrictions as provided by law.

It should be noted that the Freedom of Information principle under Executive Order No. 2 dated 23 July 2016 (An Order Operationalizing the Executive Branch the People’s Constitutional Right to Information and the State Policies to Full Public Disclosure and Transparency in the Public Service and Providing Guidelines Therefor) is not absolute since there are information and documents that the Government may still withhold from the public or any requesting person.

Relatively, in accordance with Memorandum dated 24 November 2016 (Inventory of Exceptions to Executive No. 2, Series of 2016 or the Freedom of Information Order) of Executive Secretary Salvador C. Medialdea, trade secrets, intellectual property, business, commercial, financial and other proprietary information are one of the exceptions to the public’s Right of Access to Information.

Thus, as regards the requested “Feasibility Studies” for the above-mentioned Projects, this Office opines that the same contains trade and industrial secrets as well as non-disclosure provisions affecting the Intellectual Property Rights of certain individuals, consulting firms and institutions that conducted the plans, designs and surveys for the said projects. As such, those persons or entities possessed certain proprietary and economic rights on the “Feasibility Studies” considering that its plans, designs and surveys thereof are not known to the general public and are peculiar to them.

For this reason, the DOTr, being the recipient of the “Feasibility,” has the right to safeguard its trade or industrial secrets against competitors of said individuals, consulting firms and institutions as well as the public. Otherwise, such information, if disclosed or disseminated can be illegally and unfairly utilized by other business competitors who, through their access to those business secrets, may use the same for their own private gain and to the irreparable prejudice of the owner of the said “Feasibility Studies.”

In addition, given the fact that the requested “Feasibility Studies” has yet to be submitted to other appropriate Government agencies for their corresponding comments, recommendations and issuance of permits, licenses and clearances, the information contained therein falls within the concept s of established privilege, which are strictly exclusive to those Government Agencies who will review and evaluate the railway projects.

Pursuant to Section 3 (d), Rule IV of the Rules Implementing Republic Act No. 6713, otherwise known as the “Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards for Public Officials and Employees,” every department, office of agency shall provide official information, records or documents to any requesting public, except if:
-xxx- “Such information, record or document sought falls within the concepts of established privilege or recognized exceptions as may be provided by law or settled policy or jurisprudence; and Such information, record or document comprises drafts of decisions, orders, rulings, policy and decisions memoranda, etc.” –xxx-

Relatively, it appears that the subject “Feasibility Studies,” which are still under evaluation by other Government agencies, partake the nature of an information or document comprising drafts of decisions, orders, rulings, policy and decisions memoranda that are addressed to the Government Officials concerned who are yet to finalize its recommendation and decision whether to approve or disapprove the railway projects. Hence, pending the decision or resolution of these Government agencies on the approval or disapproval of the railway projects, the same cannot yet be disclosed or disseminated to the public."

While our aim is to provide information whenever possible, in this instance this Office does not have the information you have requested. However, you may wish to contact Light rail Transit Authority (LRTA) on the same eFOI portal at https://www.foi.gov.ph/requests/new?agency=LRTA.

Is this request offensive?

Requests for personal information and vexatious requests are not considered valid requests for Official Information.

If you believe this request is not suitable, you can report it for attention by the site administrators.